What Is a Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC)?

A secure software development lifecycle (SDLC) integrates security practices throughout every stage of the traditional software development process. It focuses on identifying, addressing, and mitigating security risks early in the development process, rather than treating security as an afterthought. 

By embedding security at every phase, from requirements gathering to maintenance, an organization can proactively reduce vulnerabilities and deliver reliable software. This approach minimizes costs and improves software reliability. 

Secure SDLC isn’t limited to code-level concerns. It includes policies, tools, and best practices to ensure that security is prioritized across design, architecture, and deployment. Organizations adopting secure SDLC frameworks, like Microsoft SDL or OWASP SAMM, achieve compliance with regulations and demonstrate a commitment to protecting user data.

This is part of a series of articles about DevSecOps

Traditional vs. Secure SDLC: A Quick Comparison 

In a traditional SDLC, security is often reviewed during the testing phase after development is largely complete. This leads to the common discovery of vulnerabilities late in the lifecycle when addressing them is costly and time-intensive. Security testing, if it occurs, generally revolves around functional aspects of the system rather than thoroughly vetting the application architecture or design.

Traditional SDLC prioritizes delivering functional software quickly, often sacrificing security in the process. Secure SDLC embeds security activities into each phase, from planning to maintenance. For example, secure SDLC incorporates threat modeling during design, secure coding during implementation, and vulnerability assessments during testing. This iterative approach ensures issues are caught early.

Why Is Secure SDLC Important? 

Secure SDLC is crucial because it shifts security left—embedding it early into the software lifecycle. This minimizes the risk of costly post-release fixes and reduces the chance of data breaches and compliance failures.

Integrating security early helps identify design flaws, insecure coding patterns, and architectural vulnerabilities before they reach production. This leads to more reliable, maintainable code and lowers long-term operational costs. Additionally, regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS increasingly demand demonstrable security practices during software development. Secure SDLC frameworks help meet these requirements and avoid penalties.

By building security into the process—not bolting it on afterward—organizations strengthen their defenses, reduce risk exposure, and protect customer trust and business continuity.

{{expert-tip}}

6 Stages of the Secure Software Development Lifecycle 

Here’s an overview of the typical phases of the SDLC.

1. Requirements

During the requirements phase, security considerations must be treated as first-class citizens alongside functional specifications. This means identifying any regulatory or compliance obligations the system must meet, such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS, and understanding the types and sensitivity of the data the application will handle. Defining clear security goals—like ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and availability—is essential.

Teams should conduct business impact assessments to understand the consequences of potential security failures. Involving security architects at this stage ensures the resulting requirements are technically sound and enforceable. Additionally, security-related user stories, acceptance criteria, and even misuse cases should be documented to guide future development activities.

2. Planning

In the planning phase, the foundation for secure development is established. This includes choosing a security framework to follow—such as OWASP SAMM, Microsoft SDL, or NIST’s Secure Software Development Framework—and deciding how security activities will be integrated into project workflows. The team must clarify roles and responsibilities related to security, including who handles secure coding, who leads threat modeling, and who manages vulnerability triage.

Tool selection is another critical task: teams must decide which tools will be used for static code analysis, dependency scanning, and runtime testing. Security performance indicators should also be set to measure progress, such as the number of issues detected and resolved per sprint. Budget, security training, and governance structures are also considered to ensure the plan is realistic.

3. Design

Secure design involves shaping the system architecture in a way that minimizes risk and anticipates attacks. One of the key tasks in this phase is performing threat modeling using techniques like STRIDE or DREAD, which help teams identify potential attackers, targets, and pathways for exploitation. This process highlights the application’s attack surface and drives design decisions about where to apply security controls. 

Trust boundaries are mapped to visualize how sensitive data flows through the system and to identify points of potential compromise. The design phase also requires choosing secure defaults for configurations, enforcing least privilege, and planning for failure. Security control decisions—such as what kind of encryption, authentication, and logging will be used—are reviewed and validated by both security and development teams.

4. Implementation

During the implementation phase, developers must consistently apply secure coding practices to reduce the risk of introducing vulnerabilities. This includes validating all input to guard against injection attacks, encoding output to prevent cross-site scripting, and managing credentials securely by avoiding hardcoded secrets and using secure vaults or environment variables. Developers should rely on trusted libraries and avoid reinventing security-sensitive components like encryption or session handling.

Automated static code analysis tools help detect flaws early, while peer reviews add a human layer of insight, especially for logic and architectural issues that tools may miss. Code must be written with an understanding of the threat model, ensuring that key security assumptions hold true as the application evolves. Additionally, unit tests should be created not just for business logic but also for key security behaviors.

5. Testing & Deployment

The testing and deployment phase validates the security posture of the system in real-world conditions. Dynamic application security testing (DAST) is used to simulate attacks on a running application, helping uncover issues like authentication bypasses or insecure error handling. Interactive application security testing (IAST) may be used to blend static and runtime analysis for more accurate findings. Teams also perform software composition analysis to identify known vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies.

Security regression testing ensures that patches and updates don’t reintroduce past issues. Infrastructure must be audited for secure configurations, particularly in the case of containerized or cloud-based deployments. Before release, sensitive information such as API keys or passwords must be properly managed and encrypted. Access controls and network policies are double-checked to ensure minimal exposure.

6. Maintenance

In the maintenance phase, the application is monitored continuously to detect and respond to new threats. Logging and telemetry must be configured to track key events and enable rapid forensic analysis in case of incidents. Security patches must be applied promptly, both for the application itself and for any underlying systems or dependencies. 

Regular penetration testing helps uncover issues missed during earlier phases and keeps the security posture aligned with evolving threats. Organizations may also benefit from vulnerability disclosure programs or bug bounty initiatives to tap into external expertise. Compliance checks are periodically conducted to ensure the application continues to meet regulatory requirements. 

6 Critical Practices for Secure SDLC Success 

Here are a few important practices organizations need to adopt to successfully adopt SSDLC.

1. Threat Modeling

Threat modeling is a structured process that helps teams anticipate how an attacker might exploit the system. It starts by defining application assets, such as personal data or financial records, then identifying entry points, trust boundaries, and external dependencies. Techniques like STRIDE help categorize threats systematically (e.g., identifying spoofing risks where identity validation is weak, or data tampering opportunities in poorly validated APIs).

This process should be iterative—conducted initially during design and revisited at each major change or release. Outputs of threat modeling include a list of identified threats, corresponding mitigations, and documentation of assumptions. The process must involve security professionals alongside developers, architects, and product managers. Tools like Microsoft’s Threat Modeling Tool or OWASP Threat Dragon, helps visualize and automate this process.

2. Secure Coding Standards

Secure coding standards help reduce common vulnerabilities like injection attacks, insecure deserialization, or buffer overflows. Standards should be language-specific and integrate general security principles and contextual rules. For example, developers should be taught to avoid SQL queries with concatenated strings and instead use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.

Organizations must incorporate secure coding requirements into their development guidelines and enforce them through:

• Automated static analysis tools to detect violations in proprietary code.
• Code review checklists that include secure coding criteria.
• Mandatory training programs that teach developers about the latest threats and countermeasures.

It’s also important to ensure these standards evolve alongside technology changes, such as adopting new frameworks or moving to serverless architectures, which may introduce new risks.

3. Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

ASPM platforms centralize visibility into an application’s security health, aggregating data from multiple tools and stages of the SDLC. They enable teams to continuously assess risk by pulling in findings from:

• Static application security testing (SAST)
• Dynamic application security testing (DAST)
• Software composition analysis (SCA)
• Infrastructure scans

This unified view helps prioritize remediation based on business impact, exploitability, and asset sensitivity. ASPM tools often integrate with CI/CD pipelines, allowing real-time feedback to developers and reducing the time from detection to resolution. Some solutions also include dashboards for compliance tracking (e.g., PCI, GDPR), vulnerability aging metrics, and policy enforcement to ensure security governance across teams.

4. Third-Party Component Management

Third-party components, including open source libraries, are commonly used to accelerate development but can introduce serious vulnerabilities. Notable breaches, such as those involving Log4j, underscore the risks of unmanaged dependencies. Best practices include:

• Maintaining a software bill of materials (SBOM) to inventory all third-party packages, transitive dependencies, and versions.
• Using Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to scan for known vulnerabilities and license compliance issues.
• Applying version pinning and lock files to ensure reproducibility and reduce the risk of accidental upgrades to vulnerable versions.
• Monitoring repositories for security advisories and subscribing to notifications for critical components.

Organizations should also establish governance policies that restrict dependency use to vetted packages, and require periodic reviews and updates of third-party code.

5. Incident Response Planning

An incident response plan (IRP) prepares the organization to deal with security incidents swiftly and effectively. The plan must define clear stages—preparation, identification, containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned. It should include:

• A response team with defined roles (e.g., incident commander, forensic analyst, communications lead).
• Communication protocols including internal alerts and external disclosures, if necessary.
• Pre-approved playbooks for common attack types, such as ransomware, account takeovers, or denial-of-service attacks.

The IRP must be tested regularly through tabletop exercises and red team simulations to validate its effectiveness. Logs, alerts, and forensic evidence should be centralized and preserved for analysis. After each incident, the team should conduct a postmortem to update the plan and improve detection or response capabilities.

6. Detection and Response

Modern detection and response capabilities are essential for identifying malicious activity in real time and responding before significant damage occurs. Cloud application detection and response (CADR) platforms are tailored to monitor runtime behaviors, detect anomalies, and trigger alerts on suspicious activity. These platforms typically integrate with logging, SIEM (Security Information and Event Management), and ticketing systems to correlate events across the stack - whether they’re a vulnerability that needs to be fixed or a potential attack that needs to be acted upon immediately.

CADR solutions typically instrument the application to observe internal operations and block malicious behavior inline. For example, if an attacker tries to exploit a deserialization flaw, they can detect the payload pattern, log the attempt, and terminate the request. These tools provide valuable insight into application-level threats that traditional perimeter defenses miss, such as logic flaws, misuse of APIs, or abuse of legitimate functionality (e.g., credential stuffing).

Effective ADR implementation requires configuring detection rules based on the application's threat model and business logic. Teams must define what constitutes abnormal behavior—such as excessive token generation or unexpected data flows—and set up alerts with meaningful context. Additionally, integrating ADR feedback into the development cycle allows developers to patch vulnerable code paths and harden application defenses over time.

Protecting the SDLC with Oligo

Oligo integrates seamlessly into the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) to provide comprehensive protection for applications from development to production. By focusing on identifying risks within the running application, Oligo identifies and mitigates real risks without overwhelming developers with noise.

See how Oligo strengthens security across the SDLC.